Legal Opinion
Martin v. Halliburton
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 2, 2011No. Civil Action H-09-0328PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VANESSA D. GILMORE, District Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Instrument No. 75).
I
A
KBR, Inc. (“KBR”) contracted with the United States Government to provide noncombat, logistical support to and for the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (“LOGCAP”) of the United States Army Material Command in Iraq. (Instrument No. 82, at 6). LOGCAP is a United States Department of Defense program designed for peacetime planning and rebuilding Iraqi infrastructure. (Id.). In December of 2006, Donald Tolfree (“Tolfree”) accepted a position with KBR as a heavy truck driver…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tomas Menchaca and Wife, Irma Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wagstaff v. United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brokaw v. Boeing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- In re the Complaint of Natures Way Marine, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013