Legal Opinion
Loser v. Board of Managers of Soldiers' Home
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Mandamus. Relators applied for mandamus to compel the respondents to vacate a certain rule and order relating to the pensions of inmates of the Soldiers’ Home. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The relators, 16 in number, are inmates of the Soldiers’ Home of this State, and pray for the writ of mandamus to compel the respondents to vacate rule No. 14, adopted by the board for the management of said home, and general order No. 8, issued by the respondent McKee, as commandant. The general order and rule are as follows:
“Headquarters Michigan Soldiers’ Home.
“General Order No. 8. May 7, 1892.
“1. The following rule, adopted by the board of managers Michigan Soldiers’ Home, May 6, 1892, in regard to pensions, is published for the information of all concerned:
“Rule 14. (1) Every pensioner…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Ball v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Brooks v. HastingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Mason v. Board of Managers of Michigan Soldiers' HomeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Howell v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908