Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Robens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1906No. Docket No. 102PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Calhoun; Adams, J. Ejectment by Martha M. Coleman against Ammiel Robens and Maria P. Robens. There was judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action in ejectment to recover the possession of a strip of land described in the declaration as follows: '

“A piece of land six feet nine, and one-fourth inches wide east and west, on the street line; nine feet and seven inches wide on the south end; eight rods long north and south, off the west side of the following described parcel of land, to wit: That certain piece or parcel of land situate and being in the city of Battle Creek, county of Calhoun and State of Michigan, and described -as follows, *334to wit: Commencing in the center of Goguac street at the northwesterly corner of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Smith v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Joyce v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Beaubien v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Burns v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Argus v. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API