Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Robens
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 7, 1906No. Docket No. 102PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Calhoun; Adams, J. Ejectment by Martha M. Coleman against Ammiel Robens and Maria P. Robens. There was judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is an action in ejectment to recover the possession of a strip of land described in the declaration as follows: '
“A piece of land six feet nine, and one-fourth inches wide east and west, on the street line; nine feet and seven inches wide on the south end; eight rods long north and south, off the west side of the following described parcel of land, to wit: That certain piece or parcel of land situate and being in the city of Battle Creek, county of Calhoun and State of Michigan, and described -as follows, *334to wit: Commencing in the center of Goguac street at the northwesterly corner of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Smith v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Joyce v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Beaubien v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Burns v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Argus v. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1928