Legal Opinion

People v. Howard

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Micki A. Scherer, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss the indictment pursuant to *550CPL 210.20, 30.20 and 30.30. The People oppose the defendant’s motion.

The court notes that the defendant has the initial burden of demonstrating that his speedy trial rights were violated. (People v Brossoit, 256 AD2d 919 [3d Dept 1998].) Once the defendant has made an initial showing that the People failed to declare their readiness within the statutory time period, the burden shifts to the prosecution to identify the exclusions upon which it relies. (People v Brossoit, supra.) The parties have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. BoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. BrossoitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. DelacruzNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. MappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. People v. PenilNew York Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API