Legal Opinion

Aspe v. Pirrelli

California Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12747PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This case and Cooney v. Pirrelli, S. F. No. 12274, ante, p. 4 [266 Pac. 273], and Aspe v. Pirrelli, S. F. No. 12274a, post, p. 14 [266 Pac. 275], are companion cases as to the cause of and the circumstances attending the accident which, it is claimed, resulted in inflicting injuries upon respondent. The facts are fully set out in the first of said cited cases. One or two important propositions of law arise in the instant case which were not present in the other two cases. In the instant case, as in the said other two cases, negligence was admitted by appellant. The main disputed issues here…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klein v. MilneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cooney v. PirrelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Aspe v. PirrelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lavin v. FereiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. 29 Palms Van & Storage v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Sperisen v. HeynemannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Hoover v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Powell v. MayoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API