Sperisen v. Heynemann
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
This action was brought by the bailor of two matched jade bridal lamps against the bailee to recover the damage to one of the lamps that occurred during the bailment. The complaint is in two counts. One alleges that the bailee deviated from the terms of the bailment, and the other alleges that the bailee was negligent. The prayer is for $3,500, the alleged cost of repairing the damaged lamp. The trial court entered its judgment against defendant for the full $3,500. The findings are based entirely on the cause of action alleging deviation from the terms of the bailment. There was neither…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- James v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hollywood Motion Picture Equipment Co. v. FurerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- McQuillan v. DonahueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Benson Elec. Co. v. Hale Bros. Assoc., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Koll Hancock Torrey Pines v. Biophysica Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Herr v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Herr v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1974