Legal Opinion

Beard v. Continental State Bank of Beckville

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1925No. 3147Published

1Opinion of the Court

WTBBSON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above).

The contention of appellant, Beard, is that the judgment is erroneous so far as it directs the application of the proceeds of the sale ordered to the payment of all the notes alike, instead of to the payment in full of the three notes held by him before any part of such proceeds is applied to the payment of the note held by the appellee bank. The contention is predicated on the fact that the bank, having a right to do so (Traders’ Nat. Bank v. Price [Tex. Com. App.] 228 S. W. 160), failed to have the transfer to it of the note it held recorded,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moran v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Henderson v. PilgrimTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Traders' Nat. Bank v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Lewis v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Biswell v. GladneyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API