Legal Opinion

Hahn v. United States

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1980No. Civ. 79-650PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MUIR, District Judge.

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

On April 10, 1980, this Court issued an opinion and an order providing for further discovery on issues relating to the applicability of the Pennsylvania Recreation Use of Land and Water Act, Act of February 2, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1860, 68 P.S. §§ 477-1 et seq. In particular, the Plaintiff was given an opportunity to engage in discovery on the issue of whether 68 P.S. § 477-6(1), which provides that the provisions of the statute do not protect wilful or malicious failure to guard or warn against a dangerous condition, use,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Christobal Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Goodson v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. McClain v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1978

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Watson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Gibson v. KeithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. Gallo v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API