Legal Opinion
National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 23, 2021No. 3:15-cv-03522Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, Case No. 15-cv-03522-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR 9 v. ATTORNEY FEES 10 CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, et Re: Dkt. No. 727 al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 The National Abortion Federation (“NAF”), plaintiff, seeks an award of attorney fees of 14 $6,933,374.25 as the prevailing party in this litigation. Dkt. No. 727. Defendants – the Center for 15 Medical Progress (CMP), Biomax Procurement Services, LLC (Biomax), and David Daleiden – 16 oppose, contending that NAF did not prevail or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McGinnis v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Rosenaur v. SchererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Barnes v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Marsu, B v. Plaintiff-Counter Defendant v. The Walt Disney Company, Defendant-Counter ClaimantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Banas v. Volcano Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.