Marsu, B v. Plaintiff-Counter Defendant v. The Walt Disney Company, Defendant-Counter Claimant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Memorandum disposition filed March 25, 1999 is redesignated as an authored Opinion by Judge Harry Preger-son.
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
I
On August 14,1990, Marsu B.V. and The Walt Disney Company entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) that gave Disney the exclusive right to exploit worldwide “Marsupilami,” a cartoon character owned by Marsu. Historically, Marsupila-mi had been marketed, without supporting television exposure, in France, Belgium, and Germany in French-language comic books. In 1989, the year before Marsu entered into its Agreement with Disney, Marsupilami had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Gloria Price v. United States Navy Harry Moses Marguerite Moses (Deceased) Michael Moses Shirley MosesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Peter Odima v. Westin Tucson Hotel, a Delaware Corporation, AKA Westin HotelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Schnabel v. LuiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Lane v. Vitek Real Estate Industries GroupDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Donohue v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Grant v. Aurora Loan Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.