Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Erhardt v. MacGillivray

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1958No. 34329PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

The plaintiffs in a civil action pending in Spokane county (hereinafter referred to as the appellants) seek, in this proceeding, to have one of the attorneys for the defendants in that civil action (hereinafter referred to as the alleged contemnor) punished for contempt under the provisions of RCW 7.20.

We have, in Keller v. Keller (1958), ante p. 84, 323 P. (2d) 231, very recently had occasion to discuss and clarify our contempt statutes and procedures. As there indicated, RCW 7.20 has been variously denominated as the “civil contempt statute” and the “general contempt statute,” as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keller v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. CanuttWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Demopolis v. Peoples National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  2. State v. EstillWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. HattenWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. EstillWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API