Legal Opinion

State v. Estill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1960No. 33729, 33730Published

1Opinion of the Court

55 Wn.2d 576 (1960)

349 P.2d 210

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff,

v.

ERMIE ESTILL, Defendant. In the Matter of the Commitment of C.J. BROOKS for Contempt of Court. In the Matter of the Commitment of ROBERT REDDITT for Contempt of Court.[1]

Nos. 33729, 33730.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 4, 1960.

WEAVER, C.J.

Subsequent to the filing of the departmental opinion in this case — to which we refer for a statement of the facts involved (State v. Estill, 50 Wn. (2d) 331, 311 P. (2d) 667 (1957)) — this court granted a petition for rehearing.

After argument en banc, a majority of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. In Re MichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Fisher v. PaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. In Re the Welfare of HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API