Saavedra-Sandoval v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Hardesty, J.:
To avoid dismissal of a case, NRCP 4(i) requires a party who fails to effectuate service of process within 120 days from the filing of the complaint to demonstrate good cause for the delay of service. In 2004, NRCP 4(i) was amended to also require the party to move to enlarge the time for service prior to the expiration of the 120-day service period. If the party fails to move to enlarge the time for service within the 120-day period, ‘ ‘the court shall take that failure into consideration in determining good cause for an extension of time.” NRCP 4(i).
In this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rosenstein v. SteeleNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Abreu v. GilmerNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- Scrimer v. Eighth Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Mason v. CuisenaireNevada Supreme Court · 2006
3Cited by112 opinions
- GUZMAN VS. JOHNSONNevada Supreme Court · 2021
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
- Gonor v. DaleNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- NEV. POLICY RESEARCH INST. v. MILLERNevada Supreme Court · 2024
- VEGAS UNITED INV. SERIES 105, INC. VS. CELTIC BANK CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.