Legal Opinion
D.L. Auld Co. v. Park Electrochemical Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 22, 1982No. 81 Civ. 4086PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
The D.L. Auld Co. brings this patent infringement action against Park Electrochemical Corp. and its subsidiary, Park Nameplate Co., Inc. Park Electrochemical has moved, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), to dismiss the complaint against it for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Discussion
Because matters outside of the pleadings have been presented by both parties and not excluded by the Court, pursuant to the last sentence of Rule 12(b) this motion…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. AtlasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Forsythe v. Clark USA, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Esmark, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- William Wrigley Jr. Co. v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Hillsborough Holdings Corp. v. Celotex Corp. (In Re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Kashfi v. Phibro-Salomon, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.