Legal Opinion

Malstrom v. Consolidated Theatres, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1955No. 8361PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment awarding overtime, vacation and other pay to its moving picture projectionists, under contracts with a union of which plaintiffs are members. 1

The claims sued on are of four classes, which for convenience we designate by letters: (A) standby time, (B) vacation pay, (C) overtime, and (D) shift pay at the Gem Theatre.

The “old contract” under which the parties were operating was, by its terms, to expire December 1, 1952. The parts of interest here provide with respect to item (A) that the regular projectionist must be present whenever any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martindale v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Seybold v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ray v. Consolidated FreightwaysUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Beck v. JeppesenUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Virend v. Utah Ore-Sampling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rio Algom Corp. v. Jimco Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re Swan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Continental Bank & Trust Company v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Appeal of Lemire-Courville AssociatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. BloedelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API