Legal Opinion
United States v. Albert James Marsh
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1983No. 82-1437PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The question presented is a threshold one. It is whether or not this court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the case, in view of an alleged insufficiency arising under Rule 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The appellant James Marsh was found guilty by a jury in a case in which the charge was conspiracy to import marijuana. Judgment and sentence was entered on December 10, 1981.
Marsh filed a motion for an extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal on December 18, 1981. This was pursuant to Rule 4(b), Federal Rules of Appellate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Anne Needham v. White Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Brian Atwood Wansor v. George Hantscho Co., Inc. v. W. R. Bean & Son, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Marten v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. IbarraSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ysais v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Dennis R. Josleyn, United States of America v. John W. Billmyer, United States of America v. Dennis R. Josleyn and John W. BillmyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. CosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. CardallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.