Legal Opinion

United States v. Cardall

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1985No. 84-2320PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from orders suppressing certain evidence upon findings that government agents violated defendants’ Fourth Amendment rights, as well as upon findings that provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 2517 restricting disclosure of evidence obtained by wire interception were violated. The government has appealed, contending the trial court failed to properly consider the “good faith” rule relating to seized evidence and that the trial court improperly construed the restriction on disclosure. Appellees-defendants contest the propriety of this appeal, contending it was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard J. Leary, and F.L. Kleinberg & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1987
  3. United States v. Dracy Lamont McKneely Andrew Ellis, and Alandis Bennett, Also Known as Torjano AkinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. WicksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Gary Savaiano, and Gary McPherson and Bill CrummeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API