Legal Opinion

People in the Interest of A.L.-C

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 24, 2016No. Supreme Court Case 16SA2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hood

¶1 In this interlocutory appeal, we examine how the Colorado legislature has sought to safeguard a juvenile's constitutional right to avoid self-incrimination. Through section 19-2-511(1), C.R.S. (2016), the General Assembly has determined a juvenile cannot validly waive that right unless accompanied by a parent, guardian, legal or physical custodian, or an attorney. Here, the trial court suppressed a juvenile’s incriminating statements to police, concluding that although his mother was present, she could not protect his right to remain silent because she did not share his interests. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. MaddenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. In re the 2000-2001 District Grand Jury in & for the First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. People v. SaizSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People in Interest of L.E.R-N.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. Sommers v. MarketPlace Realty, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API