Reich v. Zeigler
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
Alessandroni, J.,
This is an action of assumpsit, which is twofold in its nature. It is alleged that defendants are officers and owners of practically all the capital stock of the Eddington Distilling Company, a Pennsylvania corporation. On May 2, 1939, plaintiff instituted suit against the corporation to recover salary due him as technical director from December 11, 1937, until May 2,1939, at the rate of $100 per week, which plaintiff claimed was the reasonable value of his services, since no definite amount had been fixed. On February 15, 1940, the jury returned a verdict in favor of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Martin v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Prettyman v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Barclay v. BarclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- First Pool Gas Coal Co. v. Wheeler Run Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.