Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wheeler Ex Rel. Wheeler v. County of Eagle Ex Rel. County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 11, 1983No. 81SC342Published

1DissentRoyira, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The trial court granted summary judgment based upon its conclusion that the County had no duty, as a matter of law, “to construct a pedestrian walkway.” The court of appeals affirmed, holding that “a county’s failure to provide a pedestrian walkway along a rural road cannot constitute actionable negligence.” Wheeler v. Baker, 636 P.2d 1326 (Colo.App.1981). The dissent in the court of appeals stated that the rule should be that a governmental entity has a duty “to exercise reasonable care to protect foreseeable plaintiffs from injury and foreseeable damages.” Id. at 1327…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Gas Repair Service, Inc. v. KulikSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Raymond v. Paradise Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Wheeler ex rel. Wheeler v. BakerColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API