Legal Opinion · Dissent

Drucker v. Tomkins Tidewater Terminal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 1947Published

1DissentCohn, J.

I think that defendant by documentary evidence as a matter of law has established its complete defense that it “ shall not be liable in any event for any loss or damage occurring to the goods covered hereby insofar as the storer of said goods or holder of this receipt shall have insurance in effect at the time of said loss or damage insuring the storer or holder against such loss or damage.” The proof submitted shows that plaintiff had the merchandise insured against loss by fire with the Phoenix Assurance Co. Ltd.; that the policy was in full force at the time of the loss; that after the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hynes v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Glinsky v. Dunham & Reid, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Fallkill Construction Co. v. HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API