Legal Opinion

Fallkill Construction Co. v. Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The affirmative testimony of Stow, that plaintiff lent the 420 feet of cable for use by this digger while engaged on this contract, is not denied by Day, the engineer, although he gives an account of the transaction somewhat different. Therefore, we cannot reject the court’s finding of fact that the cable was so furnished to be afterwards left on the dock at the end of the work. It is admitted that instead of being left on the dock it was taken away after the digger had finished the work. The judgment for its value is, therefore, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Jenks, P. J.,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Drucker v. Tomkins Tidewater TerminalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API