Bailey v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant Clark Albert Bailey challenges the trial court’s dismissal, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his petition for posir conviction relief. The trial court determined that appellant committed an abuse of process by inexcusably delaying his petition for over nine years since his conviction and sentencing. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.
FACTS
In May 1977, after pleading guilty to charges of first degree criminal sexual conduct and kidnapping, appellant Clark Albert Bailey was sentenced to consecutive indeterminate terms of 0-20 years and 0-40 years.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Roy v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Gaulke v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark A. Bailey v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987