Legal Opinion

Burbidge v. Noe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1955No. 7435Published

1Opinion of the Court

SATHRE, Judge.

The plaintiffs brought this action to cancel an oil and gas lease covering the following described lands situated in Mountrail Cohnty, North Dakota.

The Southeast Quarter (SE*4), South half of the Northwest Quarter (Si/£ NW%.), South half of the Northeast Quarter (S^NE^t), East half of the Southwest Quarter (Ei^SWj4), all in Section One (1) Township One Hundred Fifty-seven (157) West of the Fifth Principal Meridian.

The lease in controversy is what is called an “unless” lease. It provides:

“If no well be commenced on said land on or before August 15th, 1951, this lease shall be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carter Oil Co. v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API