Legal Opinion

Carter Oil Co. v. Samuels

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 9, 1937No. 24223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

■ This is an action to recover damages for the breach of an implied covenant in an oil and gas lease to protect the premises from drainage by offset wells. The lease was on a Producers 88 form and was executed on March 15, 1920, for a primary term of ten years and was subsequently assigned to the Carter Oil Company, the defendant below. Plaintiff is the owner of an undivided l/16th interest in the mineral rights which he acquired from the lessors subsequent to the execution of the lease.

The lease provided for the payment of yearly delay rentals “to the lessor, or to the lessor’s credit in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eastern Oil Co. v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. McNutt v. Whitney & WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Satterfield v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Heston Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Superior Oil Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Burbidge v. NoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Kronmiller v. HafnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API