Legal Opinion
Runnells v. Cassidy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 30, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, C.J.
The plaintiff seeks in this action to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by him while in the performance of his duties as a police officer of the city of Springfield, resulting from negligence of the defendant in the course of removing a milk wagon from a hole in a street with the aid of a “towing car.” The case was referred to an auditor whose findings of fact were not to be ■ *129final. The auditor found for the plaintiff. The case was tried to a jury upon the auditor’s report and testimony of witnesses, including the plaintiff and the defendant. There was a verdict for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pickwick v. McCauliffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Hennessey v. MoynihanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- McCarthy v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Gagnon v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Gile v. J. W. Bishop Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Goldstein v. GontarzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Kavigian v. LoneroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Darcey v. Lord & Burnham Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Shoobridge v. CallahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.