Legal Opinion
Drake v. Saul
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 11, 2020No. 20-204-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
20-204-cv Drake v. Saul UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- McIntyre v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Estrella v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Nina Green-Younger v. Joanne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.