Legal Opinion

Joyce v. McCrane

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 29, 1970No. Civ. A. 68-70PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge:

This action is brought to obtain judicial determination of the validity of the Affirmative Action Plan devised by the State of New Jersey in compliance with Executive Order #11246.

Motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 are brought by third party defendants, the federal officials who have been made parties, the State of New Jersey, the City of Newark, and George Fontaine, a citizen of Newark. These motions are based upon constitutional and other grounds.

This controversy began in the Superior Court of New Jersey (Chancery Division),…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. 6 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1013, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8993 Associated General Contractors of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Alan AltshulerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  3. NAACP v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Wiesenfeld v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API