Rodgers v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HAIRE, Judge.
The question raised by the petitioner-claimant on this review of an award of the Industrial Commission concerns the Commission’s failure to treat a second industrial injury to his right hand as an unscheduled injury. 1
The claimant’s first industrial injury consisted of the loss of two of the fingers and a portion of the palm of his right hand. This first injury resulted in a Commission award of scheduled benefits for a 45% functional loss of use of the right hand. In a subsequent industrial injury the claimant suffered a 20% ■ functional loss of use of one of the remaining…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ossic v. Verde Central MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Arnott v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- McKinney v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Wollum v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Morris v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rodgers v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Duron v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Blount v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Ross v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974