Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 21, 1971No. 1 CA-IC 300PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

The question raised by the petitioner-claimant on this review of an award of the Industrial Commission concerns the Commission’s failure to treat a second industrial injury to his right hand as an unscheduled injury. 1

The claimant’s first industrial injury consisted of the loss of two of the fingers and a portion of the palm of his right hand. This first injury resulted in a Commission award of scheduled benefits for a 45% functional loss of use of the right hand. In a subsequent industrial injury the claimant suffered a 20% ■ functional loss of use of one of the remaining…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ossic v. Verde Central MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Arnott v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. McKinney v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wollum v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Morris v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Duron v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Blount v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. Ross v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API