Legal Opinion
Holzmeyer v. Walgreen Income Protection Plan for Pharmacists & Registered Nurses
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 4, 2014No. 1:12-cv-01737-SEB-DMLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), for judicial review of the denial of long-term disability benefits. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 27] is GRANTED, and Defendant Walgreen Income Protection Plan’s motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 29] is DENIED.
Factual Background
A. Holzmeyer’s treatment history
Plaintiff Michael…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Raymond Shaw v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Kaferly v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2016
- Raymond Shaw v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015