Legal Opinion

Drake v. Dodsworth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 15, 1867PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Leavenworth County. The opinion hereto appended contains a statement of the facts of the case. 1. The bill of exceptions was assented to by defendant, whose substantial rights are not affected by the allowance of the bill by the court. Case v. Hannahs, 2 Has., 496 ; Small v. Douthitt, 1 id., 335 ; Koehler v. Ball, 2 id., 171; Lannon v. damn, 3 id., 17; 10 O. S., 236 ; 13 id., 281. 2. But no error appears. Civ.

Read the full summary

Error from Leavenworth County. The opinion hereto appended contains a statement of the facts of the case. 1. The bill of exceptions was assented to by defendant, whose substantial rights are not affected by the allowance of the bill by the court. Case v. Hannahs, 2 Has., 496 ; Small v. Douthitt, 1 id., 335 ; Koehler v. Ball, 2 id., 171; Lannon v. damn, 3 id., 17; 10 O. S., 236 ; 13 id., 281. 2. But no error appears. Civ. Code, %% 300-1-2-3. 3. It was competent for the parties to make a valid contract of purchase and sale of the defendant’s book bindery, together with the £ £ good will ’ ’…

1Opinion of the Court

*168By the Court,

Kingman, C. J.

This proceeding in error is brought to reverse an order of the district court of Leavenworth county, refusing, on application for a temporary injunction, to restrain the defendant from carrying on or working at the business of a book binder in the city of Leavenworth, and especially upon Third street, in said city.

The defendant in error makes certain objections to the regularity of the proceedings taken to get the case into this court, which are not well taken. The order refusing the injunction was made in vacation, on the 2d day of August, 1866. The bill of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mills v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Mandeville v. HarmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1886
  3. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Commercial National Bank v. Hutchinson Box Board & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Cornell v. St. Louis, Kansas & Arizona Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API