Legal Opinion

Application of William J. Krodel and Norman Hackerman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6140PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary Examiner rejecting as unpatentable over the prior art and as functional claims 18 and 19, the only remaining claims in appellants’ application for a patent for a “Process for De-inking Printed Waste Paper.”

The appealed claims read as follows:

“18. The process of de-inking printed material which comprises forming an aqueous slurry of printed and shredded waste newsprint stock material, [then adding to the slurry a water soluble salt yielding an ion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  4. In re DeLanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  5. In Re LaurentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lodge & Shipley Co. v. Holstein & KappertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API