Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 26, 2007No. 06 C 6689PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s (“Liberty”) amended complaint (“the complaint”) seeks equitable contribution from Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company (“Lumbermens”) (count I); and, alternatively, from Sears, Roebuck and Company (“Sears”) (count II). Lumber-mens and Sears have filed separate motions to dismiss each claim against them under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, Lumbermens’ motion to dismiss is denied and Sears’ motion to dismiss is granted.

I

The complaint alleges that on October 1, 1997,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kenneth A. McCready v. Ebay, Inc., Bruce Kamminga, and David McDuffeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Home Insurance v. Cincinnati InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Cincinnati Companies v. West American InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  2. Acuity v. Lenny Szarek, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API