Keilholtz v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Presiding Judge.
Harry Robert Keilholtz was convicted of possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute. He appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.
On appeal from the denial of a motion to suppress, we construe the evidence in a light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling, and we will not reverse that ruling if any evidence supports it. Viewed in this manner, the evidence shows that on January 5, 2001, the manager of a Howard Johnson’s motel contacted Detective W. J. Presnell and reported “possible drug activity…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. FolkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Pickens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Perez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Interest of A. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Disharoon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Wolf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Desmond Legrant Staley, Jr. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025