Legal Opinion
Valenti v. Board of Review of the Unemployment Compensation Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 27, 1950PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hehek, J.
The question here is whether respondent is eligible for unemployment benefits under B. S. 43:21—4(c), as amended by eh. 35 of the Session Laws of 1947. P. L., p. 94. It is conceded that the amendment accomplished by ch. 110 of the.Laws of 1948 (P. L., p. 586) is not involved.
The Board of Review of the Unemployment Compensation Commission found that respondent had refused suitable employment without good cause, and is therefore ineligible for benefits except for one month. The Appellate Division of the Superior Court resolved that the tendered…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Pusey Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Caputo v. Best Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Ford Motor Co. v. New Jersey Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Medwick v. Bd. of Review, Div. Empl. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Schock v. Bd. of Rev., Div. Empl. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.