Legal Opinion

People v. Tate

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1994No. B076382PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Kenny Wayne Tate appeals from a trial court finding that he is a mentally disordered offender (MDO) within the meaning of Penal Code section 2962. Appellant concedes the order is supported by substantial evidence but argues that the trial court should have ordered his discharge pursuant to section 2968 because of an improvement in his mental condition. We affirm and hold that section 2968 may not be raised as an affirmative defense at a section 2966 proceeding.

In 1992 appellant pled guilty to second degree robbery and was sentenced to state prison for two years. His parole…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Conservatorship of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. In Re StrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. People v. BurroughsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. People v. BurroughsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API