Legal Opinion

Adams v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

These are two actions of tort, brought by the plaintiff as executrix of the will of Otis Adams. The first action is brought, under the R. L. c. Ill, § 267, for the death of her testate, in consequence of his being struck by an electric car run by the defendant. The second action is for conscious suffering. At the trial in the Superior Court, at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the judge, at the request of the defendant, directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant in each case; and the cases are before us on the plaintiff’s exceptions.

It was incumbent on the plaintiff in each…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hall v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Dooley v. Greenfield & Turners Falls Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ristuccia v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Allen v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Smallwood v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API