Fullerton v. Government of the Canal Zone
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error, Raymond R. Fullerton, hereafter referred to as defendant, was the constable of the magistrate’s court for the division of Cristobal, Canal Zone. An audit of his books disclosed that he had failed to account for and pay over to the proper officer various fines that had been received by him in his official capacity. On demand he made good the shortage. On September 26, 1924, an affidavit was filed in the said magistrate’s court, charging defendant with having feloniously appropriated to his own use an additional amount of $91. Defendant was arrested,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hendrix v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
3Cited by12 opinions
- Washington Times Co. v. BonnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Sam Cagnina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Dobbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Irving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Hamlin v. Government of Canal Zone ex rel. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.