Legal Opinion

Kuitems v. Covell

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1951No. Civ. 17890PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The present controversy arose out of a written contract under which appellant roofing contractors agreed to and did install a roof covering for the respondents on a flat roof deck which had been erected by respondents on an owner-built home, the agreed price therefor being $487.12. The complaint, in a first count, alleges faulty workmanship by appellant contractors, and that the roofing material used was insufficient and not of a proper type, even if properly installed, to withstand the pressure of static water resulting from rainfall, the flatness of the roof being known to appellants. A…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roscoe Moss Co. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. North American Chemical Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Crabb v. Swindler, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Associated International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API