Legal Opinion
McMillan v. City of Gloucester
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 28, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a complaint under G. L. c. 59, § 65, for an abatement of taxes assessed to the complainant on real and personal property in the respondent city for 1921. The case was referred to a commissioner under an agreement that his findings of fact should be final. The commissioner’s report is printed and contains a full finding as to material facts. Under date of September 25, 1922, there is printed in the record, “Judgment on Commissioner’s report” unsigned by any judge or clerk of court; and the respondent appealed. Manifestly this is not a judgment; at most it may be treated as an order for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Boston Rubber Shoe Co. v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Manning v. Woodlawn Cemetery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Davis v. GayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gallagher v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Untersee v. UnterseeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Cheraska v. OhanasianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Morse v. O'HaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Commonwealth v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.