Legal Opinion

Harrigan v. Hertz Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 30, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.), dated January 12, 2000, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them based upon the failure of the plaintiff Cheryl B. Harrigan to sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the motion papers submitted by the defendants failed to establish a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mendola v. DemetresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Feuerman v. AchtarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API