Legal Opinion

Monitor Drill Co. v. Mercer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1908No. 2,828PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for District of Minnesota.

1Opinion of the Court

W. H. MUNGER, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court, affirming the order .and findings of the referee in bankruptcy. By the facts as shown it appears that the Western Implement Compány, a corporation, and the Monitor Drill Company, a corporation, in January, 1906, entered into two certain contracts, by the 'terms of which the Monitor Drill Company, designated the first party, agreed to sell to the Western Implement Company, designated the second party, certain agricultural implements at certain prices, to be delivered f. o. b. at its factory in St. Louis Park,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Big Four Implement Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. McDonald Automobile Co. v. BicknellTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. McArthur Bros. Mercantile Co. v. HagiharaArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Northwest Engineering Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API