Legal Opinion
Austin Nichols & Co. v. The Isla De Panay. Sanchez v. Same. E. Tolibia & Co. v. Same
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 2, 1925No. 199, 200, 201PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
These are proceedings in rem against the Isla de Panay to recover for damage to merchandise brought by her from Cadiz, Spain. They present the same issues and were heard on the same proof. It will suffice to refer to the facts disclosed in number 199.
December 21,1917, in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Austin Nichols & Company, a corporation, filed, a libel and complaint against the respondent steamship.
It' alleged: Ownership of the damaged merchandise. Presence of the vessel within the court’s jurisdiction. That “ On October 27, 1917, Rowlett y Pyman shipped…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HaroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Oelricks v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Higgins v. Anglo-Algerian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Bowling v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Adams v. OtterbackSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
3Cited by42 opinions
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company v. United States Fo AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Portland Fish Company, a Corporation v. States Steamship Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- T. J. Stevenson & Co. v. 81,193 Bags of FlourCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- The CarsoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.