Fetherston v. Parks
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtKloppenburg, J.
¶ 1. Acuity, a mutual insurance company, appeals an order dismissing American Family Mutual Insurance Company as a defendant in this action.1 Acuity argues that the circuit court erroneously concluded that the intentional injury exclusion in the insurance policy issued by American Family to its insured, Michael Parks, applied to preclude coverage for injuries suffered by Acuity's insureds, Gregory and Heather Fetherston, when the vehicle that Parks was driving hit their vehicle. We agree. Because it is undisputed that Parks did not intend to injure the Fetherstons when he operated his vehicle…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Pachucki v. Republic Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Loveridge v. ChartierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Raby v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lindsey Dostal v. Curtis StrandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Jones v. BaeckerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- Ali M. Shire v. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., Crosstown Surgery Center, and Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Babcock v. Town of Sugar CreekDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
- Knox, Lora v. American Family Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.