Legal Opinion

Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 10, 1969No. C.D. 3772Published

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this protest consists of three articles: two described on the invoices as BMA cossette pumps, and one described as a chokeless pump. The merchandise was classified under item 660.90, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as pumps for liquids and parts thereof, and assessed with duty at the rate of 12 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the imported articles are entitled to free entry pursuant to the provisions of item 666.20, as machinery for use in the manufacture of sugar, and parts thereof.

At the trial plaintiff abandoned its claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kayser & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Swiss Manufactures Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Richard Crittall Radiant Heating Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Western Cartridge Co. v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API