Petrik v. Nat. Slovak Union (Et Al.)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
The parties are rival claimants in an interpleader framed to test their respective rights to a fund paid into court by the National Slovak Union, a fraternal benefit association incorporated under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania. In the feigned issue Josephine Petrik was plaintiff and John Balek defendant. After a verdict for defendant the court below entered judgment for plaintiff n. o. v., and defendant has appealed.
The testimony must be considered in the light most favorable to appellant. Walters v. Kaufmann Department Stores, Inc., 334 Pa. 233, 5 A. 2d 559, 560.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Grant v. FairesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Walters v. Kaufmann Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Noble v. Police Beneficiary Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. William Penn Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company Of Philadelphia v. Selma EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Stasevicius v. SlauzisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Kopachuk (Et Al.) v. Providence Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975