Legal Opinion

Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. Ehrlich

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 27, 1975No. Nos. 74-1353 and 74-1354PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

The break up of a family is an unhappy affair whose consequences linger on long after the event and often involve strangers as well as those directly concerned. In this case a life insurance company finds itself in the unpleasant position of being beset by competing claims of two wives of a deceased insured. While both have sympathetic appeal, we conclude that only one can prevail here. The decision of the district court in making an award to both women, while somewhat solomonic in nature, we find to lack legal support.

Dr. Edward Ehrlich left his wife,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Breckline v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Riley v. WirthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Ham v. GougeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Crane v. CRANESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company Of Philadelphia v. Selma EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API