Legal Opinion

Friedlander v. Stanley Productions, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1938No. Civ. 11665PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action for declaratory relief, the complaint alleging that a certain contract between the parties was canceled and that the plaintiff was under no contractual obligation to the defendant by virtue of said agreement.

For several years plaintiff had been employed by Universal Pictures Corporation as a director. During no part of said time did he have a personal representative or manager until he entered into the contract hereinafter referred to on January 29, 1936. On that date the plaintiff and defendants entered into an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Collier & Wallis, Ltd. v. AstorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hanes v. CoffeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Johnson v. AtkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Silva v. MercierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Wetsel v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API