Legal Opinion

(PC) Bell v. Warden

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 30, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00534Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN BELL, No. 2:21-cv-0534 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 WARDEN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 19

636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As plaintiff has submitted a 21 declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his request will be granted. 22 Plaintiff is required to pay…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API