State v. Anthony
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
*46 Defendant appeals from an order imposing lifetime satellite-based monitoring ("SBM"). Although the State presented argument to the trial court regarding the risk of recidivism by sex offenders based upon various studies and statistics, the State did not provide the studies to Defendant or the trial court. The statistics noted by the State were not subject to judicial notice under Rule 201 since they are subject to reasonable dispute and they are not "either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grady v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- State v. BowditchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. HiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. StrudwickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. StrudwickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. StrudwickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020